.
Feedback

Russell: Southold Needs To Redefine Code Enforcement Officer Position

Board wants to clarify the role of code enforcement in town.

Since Southold Town Zoning Inspector Damon Rallis took a new position as plans examiner for the town on Jan. 1, the town has had no official full-time point person to deal with complaints regarding potential town code violations — the duty of a zoning inspector or a code enforcement officer, according to job descriptions on the Civil Service Employee Union’s website.

At this week’s Southold Town Board work session, Supervisor Scott Russell gave the board an update on his goal to re-create and ultimately fill the position. Ed Forrester, Southold Town’s last director of code enforcement, retired four years ago.

“This job needs to be clear from the beginning as to what it entails,” Russell told the board on Tuesday. “Who will supervise the code enforcement officer — that board? The town attorney? The building department? Police?”

Russell and department heads from the Planning, Building and Zoning Board of Appeals departments have been meeting over the past few weeks to discuss how to better approach code enforcement — an issue that has been in the news lately surrounding Satur Farms, Vineyard 48, and the ever-present illegal dumping of trash in town-provided cans at road ends.

“This is a very important position, and proper training is key,” Russell said. “We need to better streamline how complaints are received and how they are handled.”

Russell added that the town board needs to decide if future code enforcement will be complaint-driven as it has been in the past, or if  the town “wants to be more assertive about enforcing the code.

“The board is looking to create a position that involves much more then simply responding to complaints,” Russell later wrote Patch in an email. “The position will not only respond to complaints that come it but will also take an affirmative role in going out and ensuring compliance with the code.”

Russell said that the new position will require working outside of the normal business hours of town government, and that ultimately the role will need to be filled by more than one person.

What do you think? Tell us in the comments.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from North Fork Patch? Find your Local Patch »

James Spanos February 2, 2013 at 11:25 am
Bravo!!
It's about time.
gwen February 2, 2013 at 02:01 pm
Code enforcement is effective if there is an attitude that the code should be enforced without exception. One situation involves Santa's Christmas Tree Farm at the top of Pequash Ave. in Cutchogue running a large retail business in what is /was an ag/residential zone. The "powers that be" were pro-business to the extent that it was understood that occasional mild threats were all that was expected of Mr. Forrester. The situation had some sort of legal resolution in the end. It's a popular business, and a fine addition to the community. But the result was no proper site plan, and the result of that is a dangerous traffic situation at the intersection of the Main Road and Pequash. The westbound turning lane south onto Pequash is often occupied by eastbound vehicles waiting to turn north into Santa's driveway, which is clearly a problem. Locals know to watch out for visitors from the west trying to get into Santa's and not understanding the confusing turning lane situation, but there have been many accidents over the years. It is particularly silly because the xmas tree property has a farm road leading off Depot Lane, which would be an obvious solution to the ingress/egress problem. So, yes, let's give code enforcement some teeth and resolve the Satur, V48 and Santa's issues. There are only going to be more businesses starting and growing in Southold Town in years to come, and legal situations are way more expensive for taxpayers than code enforcement officers.
Marty February 2, 2013 at 02:38 pm
You are partially correct, but the real story is more sinister. The town took the tree farm all the way to Supreme Court and won (after spending a lot of your money). The judge ruled in favor of the town and, as a result, was ordered shut down. Sadly, the pro-business administration that you speak of felt bad and, in the end, granted him a variance as a "farm stand" - if thats a farm stand, I have a bridge for sale. How can there be code enforcement when things like that happen.
Southold town resident February 2, 2013 at 07:16 pm
And at the same time could the CEO enforce Southold Town's Sign laws as well.?
James Spanos February 2, 2013 at 07:17 pm
When the town push people into court on our tax dollar it's a crime.
I love this town and have been tying to work with the dysfunctional building department for years. There are many examples of unequal coad enforcement. What about the guy that is running a commercial business by Magic Fountain in Mattituck? That place is zoned residential on one lot and the other one is light industrial. He's doing whatever he wants and nobody messes with him. Most people don't know the whole story about government bullies.
James Cope February 2, 2013 at 09:08 pm
I trust and support Supervisor Russell's efforts to improve local code enforcement.
Jim Cope Eastmarion
Marty February 2, 2013 at 09:32 pm
I would love to hear the whole story.
Steven Anderson February 3, 2013 at 02:20 am
And also let's have more serious punishment for DWI repeat offenders,right Gwen.
Hope and Change February 4, 2013 at 02:06 pm
I believe the supervisor's push to have all code enforcement officers wear YELLOW GARGAGE BAGS on the job is perfectly in line with his YELLOW GARGAGE BAG approach to town government.
nawthfawk February 6, 2013 at 02:57 am
That was really hateful and uncalled for.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
1927 Steinway Model M
Localtucker June 18, 2013 at 02:30 pm
once it is moved, it needs to be tuned, no one is going to help you with the moving costs.
Bernie K June 18, 2013 at 08:27 am
And, now that we know how easy it is to thwart the law, we must wonder...how many potentialRead More terrorists are residing here, thanks to breaks in our security system? Maybe the Mexico/U.S. border shouldn't be our top priority.
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Now lets go after all the landscapers , farmers & builders that hire Illegals. Time to put ourRead More foot down on this ongoing problem
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:49 pm
They will probably be back to work tomorrow selling Slurpees!
north fork magazine MAY 2013 issue on left & my original illustration on right.
Rena Casey-Wilhelm June 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
even worse?...When I had the publisher of North Fork Magazine contact me regarding the blatantRead More violation, what were his comments?? To add further insult to injury, he said & I quote: "I thought I was doing Greenport a favor...all of the businesses there are suffering...this paper doesn't make any money...sure I have advertisers but they don't pay their invoices...maybe if the cover of the magazine brings business to Greenport, maybe those merchants will pay their bill.."
Rich from the East End June 16, 2013 at 08:02 am
Better yet, rather than pay mag's invoice. send $$$ to Artist.
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:41 pm
And he really still doesn't see that he's stealing from the artist to 'bring business to Greenport'?Read More The effrontery of his comment leaves me aghast. Of ALL people who should grasp the concept of plagiarism and copyright laws, it should be a newspaper editor/publisher! Cropping out her signature proves they knew full well that they were stealing her work. I'd suggest the artist contact a copyright attorney pronto. I'm always astonished when something like this occurs when a simple phone call to the artist might have been successful in allowing him to use her work WITH her signature intact instead of doing something so underhanded.
Pat Mundus June 14, 2013 at 08:51 am
I have a 16mm and great 1940s speakers for it. Hope your film holds up for viewing...thrilled to putRead More it to good use. Call my office 477-6993
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:31 pm
I've just tried to do a Google search for you and from what I've found you need to either check withRead More your local library to see if they have one they might lend you--OR--try Audio/Visual online companies. There are some which DO rent projectors for days or weekends. I have one but just checked with my husband and at the very least it needs a replacement bulb(which are fairly expensive)--hasn't been looked at in years so there's no way I could guarantee it would work. You've definitely given me an idea, though--I'll get mine in shape at some point and rent it to folks for a nominal sum. I'm sure there are many others who have old film they'd enjoy viewing for family reunions as would my own family. Good luck. If you don't succeed for next weekend, you have other options. At the very least you might be able to have the film transposed to a DVD and distributed to your family members although that's costly too, depending on how many copies you need. Just a thought, but you could add the old footage in with some taken AT the reunion as a nice follow-up gift for the attendees?
Localtucker June 11, 2013 at 06:22 pm
I think it adds character.
Eric Larson June 11, 2013 at 07:51 pm
a foto of the old jail in Greenport would have more character than a wooden sign but beauty is inRead More the eyes of the beholder.
Benja Schwartz June 11, 2013 at 09:02 pm
In this day of the dawning of digital photography Patch could advertise $10-$100 per photo and haveRead More a list of upcoming and current photo ops for moonlighters to access. The result could be a new dimension of online journalism.