.
Feedback

Russell: County’s 10 Towns Need to Come Together on Garbage

Southold Town Board discusses upcoming changes to the way the town handles garbage, supervisor says individual transfer stations are no longer feasible.

With ongoing unrest in Southold Town about the expense and inconvenience regarding mandated yellow garbage bags for both residents and independent garbage carters, members of the Southold Town Board are looking into long-term solutions to make doing garbage better on the North Fork.

At Tuesday night’s board meeting, Councilman William Ruland said that the process of hauling garbage from the town transfer station in Cutchogue out to other states for incineration is becoming a thing of the past — it’s not sustainable economically or environmentally.

“There is no better way to ensure recycling than source separation, which is what our yellow bag system is meant to do, but the key is with the carters and the bigger businesses around here,” he said, referring to restaurants and businesses who use dumpsters and are exempt from the yellow bag law, thus in theory recycling less and hurting the town’s transfer center economically.

A slideshow at a November Southold Town Board meeting, when yellow bags became mandated for all residents, revealed that yellow bags, which can be purchased at the solid waste facility or at select retail stores in town, not only provide the town with $425,000 of its annual $4,154,00 revenue, the yellow bag system has also dramatically increased recycling efforts by residents in Southold Town since its state approval in 1995. The Town currently has an annual recycling rate of 31 percent — the highest of any on Long Island, according to a study conducted by the Stony Brook University Waste Reduction and Management Institute.

But even with the high recycling rate, Scott Russell said that he and board members would like to see better compliance with the recycling rates from commercial operations on the whole.

“The law is already on the books — it is New York State law that any material that can be recycled needs to be pulled out of the regular waste stream and handled separately and delivered to recycling markets,” he said.

But the bigger issue for Russell is the hauling of garbage out of state by long haul trucks, which themselves use expensive fuel which isn’t good for the environment nor for Southold’s bottom line, he said.

“We have been looking for options that would not only increase our recycling efforts but would also reduce the need for trucking off Long Island,” Russell said. “Sooner or later, destinations such as Ohio or West Virginia may simply no longer be available to us. Personally, I think it is a train wreck coming and it needs to be addressed sooner rather then later.”

The root economic problem with the system is that most places available to handle garbage are expensive and require a lot of garbage to be economically compelling. Southold, Russell said, does not have that kind of money nor the amount of refuse in its waste stream to do that kind of business at its own waste facility.

“Systems like gasification, or burn-to-energy plants cost a great deal of money to construct and require lots of refuse to ‘feed,’” he said. “We have had various representatives come before the board to propose different ideas, but to date, none of these plans proved to be economically viable.”

Russell said he is going to reach out to the supervisors of Suffolk County’s 10 towns to consider working together to develop a regional solution to a growing problem.

“Economically, this would make more sense then the different jurisdictions all going in different directions,” he said.

What do you think? Should garbage be handled regionally rather than locally?

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone everyday with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

Jim February 13, 2013 at 05:35 pm
Mr. Supervisor.....There has been a vast increase in small dumpsters, appearing in residential driveways, (provided by the local carters) for no other reason then to avoid the recycling issue. This issue should be addressed, with the private carters and only allow them to provide a residential home with a container, when a permit for such a container, has been provided by the town, to the homeowner. A time restriction should be attached to that permit when issued. They are not only unsightly they are a health issue.
Erin Schultz (Editor) February 13, 2013 at 06:08 pm
George Stephens said on Facebook: "Time for the town once and for all to get out of the solid waste business and let private enterprise handle it."
Benja Schwartz February 16, 2013 at 01:29 am
Russell said. “Sooner or later, destinations such as Ohio or West Virginia may simply no longer be available to us. Personally, I think it is a train wreck coming and it needs to be addressed sooner rather then later.”
Really, is that why Southold has stopped source separation of recyclables? Is that why there is no longer any Southold Town agent responsible for recycling? Rather then seeking a candidate for the Recycling Coordinator position, Russell abolished the position. Russell continues to attack me personally rather than address the issue.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from North Fork Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
1927 Steinway Model M
Localtucker June 18, 2013 at 02:30 pm
once it is moved, it needs to be tuned, no one is going to help you with the moving costs.
Bernie K June 18, 2013 at 08:27 am
And, now that we know how easy it is to thwart the law, we must wonder...how many potentialRead More terrorists are residing here, thanks to breaks in our security system? Maybe the Mexico/U.S. border shouldn't be our top priority.
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Now lets go after all the landscapers , farmers & builders that hire Illegals. Time to put ourRead More foot down on this ongoing problem
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:49 pm
They will probably be back to work tomorrow selling Slurpees!
north fork magazine MAY 2013 issue on left & my original illustration on right.
Rena Casey-Wilhelm June 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
even worse?...When I had the publisher of North Fork Magazine contact me regarding the blatantRead More violation, what were his comments?? To add further insult to injury, he said & I quote: "I thought I was doing Greenport a favor...all of the businesses there are suffering...this paper doesn't make any money...sure I have advertisers but they don't pay their invoices...maybe if the cover of the magazine brings business to Greenport, maybe those merchants will pay their bill.."
Rich from the East End June 16, 2013 at 08:02 am
Better yet, rather than pay mag's invoice. send $$$ to Artist.
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:41 pm
And he really still doesn't see that he's stealing from the artist to 'bring business to Greenport'?Read More The effrontery of his comment leaves me aghast. Of ALL people who should grasp the concept of plagiarism and copyright laws, it should be a newspaper editor/publisher! Cropping out her signature proves they knew full well that they were stealing her work. I'd suggest the artist contact a copyright attorney pronto. I'm always astonished when something like this occurs when a simple phone call to the artist might have been successful in allowing him to use her work WITH her signature intact instead of doing something so underhanded.
Pat Mundus June 14, 2013 at 08:51 am
I have a 16mm and great 1940s speakers for it. Hope your film holds up for viewing...thrilled to putRead More it to good use. Call my office 477-6993
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:31 pm
I've just tried to do a Google search for you and from what I've found you need to either check withRead More your local library to see if they have one they might lend you--OR--try Audio/Visual online companies. There are some which DO rent projectors for days or weekends. I have one but just checked with my husband and at the very least it needs a replacement bulb(which are fairly expensive)--hasn't been looked at in years so there's no way I could guarantee it would work. You've definitely given me an idea, though--I'll get mine in shape at some point and rent it to folks for a nominal sum. I'm sure there are many others who have old film they'd enjoy viewing for family reunions as would my own family. Good luck. If you don't succeed for next weekend, you have other options. At the very least you might be able to have the film transposed to a DVD and distributed to your family members although that's costly too, depending on how many copies you need. Just a thought, but you could add the old footage in with some taken AT the reunion as a nice follow-up gift for the attendees?