.
Feedback

Greenport Farmers' Market Reps Ask Village Board for a New Location

Organizers of the Greenport Farmers' Market are seeking to move for the 2012 season.

 

After its debut season, the board of the Greenport Farmers' Market asked the Board to move the market to the South Street parking lot just west of the

Greenport Mayor David Nyce said the group originally requested a permit for the Adams Street parking lot but after meeting with the Greenport Business Improvement District, they amended their request to the South Street location. because the Greenport Farmers' Market used spaces in the municipal lot during prime Saturday morning hours during the summer season.

Nyce read from a letter from the board of the farmers' market in which the group stated they would like to work with local businesses, and they recognized the hardship some local businesses faced by using parking spaces in the Adams Street lot. The group also said that by moving the market to the South Street lot, the problem they faced by overnight parking would diminish.

The Greenport Farmers' Market also requested that the permit be extended for three years, allowing them to use the location on Saturday mornings between the Saturday before Memorial Day through the Saturday after Columbus Day.

The mayor also read a letter written by owner Claudia Helinski, where she urged the board to deny a permit for the Adams Street lot.

"The farmers' market is a welcome addition, but the proposed location (Adams Street parking lot) is damaging to Salamander's," Helinski said.

Helinski said she has had record crowds for the last three years but saw business drop off on Saturday mornings in 2011 when the Greenport Farmers' Market was open. 

Nyce said a portion of the February work session of the Greenport Village Board will be a public forum to discuss the Greenport Farmers' Market continued operations in Greenport, similar to a public forum held in 2011.

Amy K. Martin February 1, 2012 at 05:29 am
Great location choice by the market organizers as a concession to unhappy neighboring businesses. Classy move l wish you continued success
Chris McManus February 1, 2012 at 07:28 am
Why can't the farmer's market be at Mitchell Park? The park is beautiful and the farmer's market would attract crowds with open wallets -- brining more people out to patronize local businesses. Last year's location created problem for merchants. Using the park will solve that and bring them more customers. Another term for farmer's market is green market. Sounds like Mitchell Park to me.
James Dinizio Jr February 1, 2012 at 01:32 pm
How about a location where they can pay rent and taxes just like every other business in town.
Caroline Waloski February 1, 2012 at 01:34 pm
Success to the Greenport Farmers Market in 2012. It is a wonderful addition to the village attracting newcomers, and in the long run aids all business. It was the biggest draw on Saturday mornings last summer. As a resident I loved having local produce so available. Hopefully the market will remain in the village center where it attracts customers who then explore other local business.
John February 1, 2012 at 05:12 pm
and in the long run aids all business...Hopefully the market will remain in the village center where it attracts customers who then explore other local business.
There are maybe 40 merchants, but at least 1000 taxpayers, why is an honest rent to help ease the burden of the average resident never discussed. The rent paid to the Village last year for that parking lot for 26 vendors for 24 weeks came to about $1.70 per vendor per week. The Village along with the BID should try and promote business for merchants, but that does not mean it should ignore the taxpayer in doing it. Have the market, just let them pay a fair rent for the space.
Chris McManus February 1, 2012 at 08:33 pm
Great point on the rent. I still think Mitchell Park could be a great venue for the Farmer's Market. We can determine a fair rent and use the money to support the maintenance of the park. Everyone wins! Vendors have a wonderful 'green' location that will attract crowds. Those crowds will in turn throw business to the local vendors. And market fees help with park upkeep.
Paul Wood February 3, 2012 at 04:49 pm
The market brings many people to town for all sorts of additional shopping and eating. The ammended site selection is very good, altho the Adam St. location was good also. Lara does a very good job and the Friends of Floyd Memorial Libary back up her selection. The Market allowed the Friends to raise funds for the library's children programs by having a table on several Saturdays.
Paul Wood, President of the Friends of Floyd memorial Library.
James Dinizio Jr February 5, 2012 at 02:31 pm
Greenport doesn't have a problem attracting people on weekends but it does have a parking problem on weekends.Allowing theis group to takeupspace that should be available for the taxpaying businesses in the village is an affront to every business that needs the revenue to help it get through the winter, How about holding the Farmers Market to the same standard the the existing farm stand in conforming to.
forward thinking February 5, 2012 at 03:12 pm
MITCHELL PARK SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT ... HAVE VENDORS ADD 15% FOR THE VILLAGE "SURCHARGE" THIS SHOULD GIVE RELIEF TO PARKING - ADD A SHUTTLE FROM SCHOOL TO TOWN THIS WILL ADDITIONALLY HELP... INCLUDE A "TOWN" MAP ETC ALL FOR A BUCK ???....
William Swiskey sr February 5, 2012 at 05:00 pm
Perhaps we could move it to Cochran park same as the Osprey. The Osprey was as much of an attraction as the market.
James Dinizio Jr February 5, 2012 at 10:32 pm
It is interesting that the village board could find room for all those tents but could not manage to squeeze in a 2 ft by 2 ft steel beam. You know the Library has plenty of room on the lot just to the south of their building. It's only a couple blocks away from the proposed site.
John February 5, 2012 at 10:48 pm
If the owner of the Ospreyl lived next door to the Mayor, maybe he would have gotten the same consideration as the farmers market.
William Swiskey sr February 6, 2012 at 01:17 am
To bad the mayor wasn't as hot on the Osprey as he is on the Farmers Market. Maybe we would still have our symbol of freedom.
Jerry Cibulski February 6, 2012 at 02:06 pm
I think the market is a great idea and postive addition to the community. The market adds a sense of community, a social gathering space and a venue to explore and support local North Fork farming. You can not fault an outdoor market. With postive and open conversation a solution will be found for the appropriate location. I see the parking concerns with last years location and had to find other locations in the morning but I did learn about local farming producers in the area because of the market. This is a good problem to have. The park and library could be interesting locations. I am excited to see what the new location will be.
Chris McManus February 10, 2012 at 04:39 pm
And yes, let's get our Osprey back! I miss it too! Should we start a petition?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from North Fork Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
1927 Steinway Model M
Localtucker June 18, 2013 at 02:30 pm
once it is moved, it needs to be tuned, no one is going to help you with the moving costs.
Bernie K June 18, 2013 at 08:27 am
And, now that we know how easy it is to thwart the law, we must wonder...how many potentialRead More terrorists are residing here, thanks to breaks in our security system? Maybe the Mexico/U.S. border shouldn't be our top priority.
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Now lets go after all the landscapers , farmers & builders that hire Illegals. Time to put ourRead More foot down on this ongoing problem
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:49 pm
They will probably be back to work tomorrow selling Slurpees!
north fork magazine MAY 2013 issue on left & my original illustration on right.
Rena Casey-Wilhelm June 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
even worse?...When I had the publisher of North Fork Magazine contact me regarding the blatantRead More violation, what were his comments?? To add further insult to injury, he said & I quote: "I thought I was doing Greenport a favor...all of the businesses there are suffering...this paper doesn't make any money...sure I have advertisers but they don't pay their invoices...maybe if the cover of the magazine brings business to Greenport, maybe those merchants will pay their bill.."
Rich from the East End June 16, 2013 at 08:02 am
Better yet, rather than pay mag's invoice. send $$$ to Artist.
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:41 pm
And he really still doesn't see that he's stealing from the artist to 'bring business to Greenport'?Read More The effrontery of his comment leaves me aghast. Of ALL people who should grasp the concept of plagiarism and copyright laws, it should be a newspaper editor/publisher! Cropping out her signature proves they knew full well that they were stealing her work. I'd suggest the artist contact a copyright attorney pronto. I'm always astonished when something like this occurs when a simple phone call to the artist might have been successful in allowing him to use her work WITH her signature intact instead of doing something so underhanded.
Pat Mundus June 14, 2013 at 08:51 am
I have a 16mm and great 1940s speakers for it. Hope your film holds up for viewing...thrilled to putRead More it to good use. Call my office 477-6993
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:31 pm
I've just tried to do a Google search for you and from what I've found you need to either check withRead More your local library to see if they have one they might lend you--OR--try Audio/Visual online companies. There are some which DO rent projectors for days or weekends. I have one but just checked with my husband and at the very least it needs a replacement bulb(which are fairly expensive)--hasn't been looked at in years so there's no way I could guarantee it would work. You've definitely given me an idea, though--I'll get mine in shape at some point and rent it to folks for a nominal sum. I'm sure there are many others who have old film they'd enjoy viewing for family reunions as would my own family. Good luck. If you don't succeed for next weekend, you have other options. At the very least you might be able to have the film transposed to a DVD and distributed to your family members although that's costly too, depending on how many copies you need. Just a thought, but you could add the old footage in with some taken AT the reunion as a nice follow-up gift for the attendees?
Localtucker June 11, 2013 at 06:22 pm
I think it adds character.
Eric Larson June 11, 2013 at 07:51 pm
a foto of the old jail in Greenport would have more character than a wooden sign but beauty is inRead More the eyes of the beholder.
Benja Schwartz June 11, 2013 at 09:02 pm
In this day of the dawning of digital photography Patch could advertise $10-$100 per photo and haveRead More a list of upcoming and current photo ops for moonlighters to access. The result could be a new dimension of online journalism.
Steve Bull June 12, 2013 at 09:22 am
I believe this photo is a poor example of pollution on Long Island. I would prefer to see and photoRead More of a million dollar home with a lush green lawn mowed to a bulkhead above the waters edge. I believe the excess fertilizers used to keep the invasive specie of the lawn grasses green along with the broad-leaf pesticides to keep the "weeds" controlled are a prime source of pollution to our local bays, estuaries and ocean front.
Christopher Casey June 13, 2013 at 01:14 pm
Thank you for your comment Steve, we have a big section of the land pollution chapter specificallyRead More about run-off pollution related to pesticides and other toxins. We really need more fundraising to help us, visit the fundraiser page here: http://igg.me/at/long-island-pollution/x/3272641 to donate and become a contributor to the film. Thank you for your support!