.
Feedback

County Approves Peconic Estuary Wastewater Treatment Study

Krupski, Bellone team up to fund pilot study for clustered wastewater treatment alternatives for the Peconic Estuary Watershed.

Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone and new legislator Al Krupski partnered on legislation passed Tuesday appropriating $90,000 from the Water Quality Protection and Restoration Program to fund a pilot study of clustered wastewater treatment alternatives for the Peconic Estuary Watershed. 

The study will determine the viability of clustered treatment of decentralized wastewater in the watershed area. The Peconic Estuary Watershed, which begins at the headwaters of the Peconic River and extends east, drains into the bays between the North and South Forks and extends to portions of five towns, including Brookhaven, Riverhead, Southampton, East Hampton, Southold and Shelter Island. 

“During the last decade, a great deal has been done to protect the estuary, one of the great environmental treasures of the East End, including sewage plant upgrades, storm water abatement and wetlands restoration,” Legis. Krupski said in a statement. “But more needs to be done, especially in the area of wastewater treatment. This pilot study will provide information that will help Suffolk County and local municipalities make informed decisions about the implementation and potential benefits of clustered wastewater treatment systems in existing communities located within the Peconic Estuary.”

Clustering enables several residential units to connect to a common wastewater treatment system, which allows for the utilization of more innovative systems and offers potential cost advantages, as well as environmental benefits. The pilot will execute the planning and preliminary design of pilot projects for clustered wastewater treatment in existing communities, with a goal of reducing nitrogen loading in the estuary that leaches into groundwater and migrates to surface water bodies.

The study will be conducted by Peconic Green Growth, a not-for-profit organization, under the direction of the Department of Economic Development and Planning, Division of Environmental Planning. Peconic Green Growth submitted a grant application as a result of a call for submissions and was one of nine projects chosen by the Water Quality Protection and Restoration Program Review Committee to receive grants. 

For years, environmental advocates like Kevin McAllister of the Peconic Baykeeper association have pushed for alternatives to aging residential cesspool systems. County Executive Bellone sais he agreed that evidence suggests a link between onsite individual residential wastewater treatment systems and water quality within the estuary. 

“Many older coastal communities still rely on cesspools and onsite septic wastewater treatment,” Bellone said in a statement. “This pilot study is an essential step in an ongoing process to protect the estuary and Suffolk water quality for future generations by identifying the most viable wastewater treatment alternatives for the many structures that already exist within the watershed area.” 

Professor Edelson February 7, 2013 at 10:21 pm
A disgraceful use of $$$ intended to help maintain water quality. Using the $$ to build more and put in a small sewer system. Better to not build at all. Watch where this "study" $$ goes and who owns the project. It smells like a cluster system.
joe insider February 9, 2013 at 01:28 am
"It smells like a cluster system."? Quite the detective aren't you? Of course the article uses the words "cluster system" about a billion times. Even a careless review of the article would reveal that this is for existing homes in existing communities, not "build more". I suppose all of the scientists and environmentalists are wrong because the "professor" declares it so.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from North Fork Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
1927 Steinway Model M
Localtucker June 18, 2013 at 02:30 pm
once it is moved, it needs to be tuned, no one is going to help you with the moving costs.
Bernie K June 18, 2013 at 08:27 am
And, now that we know how easy it is to thwart the law, we must wonder...how many potentialRead More terrorists are residing here, thanks to breaks in our security system? Maybe the Mexico/U.S. border shouldn't be our top priority.
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:39 pm
Now lets go after all the landscapers , farmers & builders that hire Illegals. Time to put ourRead More foot down on this ongoing problem
Robert June 17, 2013 at 12:49 pm
They will probably be back to work tomorrow selling Slurpees!
north fork magazine MAY 2013 issue on left & my original illustration on right.
Rena Casey-Wilhelm June 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
even worse?...When I had the publisher of North Fork Magazine contact me regarding the blatantRead More violation, what were his comments?? To add further insult to injury, he said & I quote: "I thought I was doing Greenport a favor...all of the businesses there are suffering...this paper doesn't make any money...sure I have advertisers but they don't pay their invoices...maybe if the cover of the magazine brings business to Greenport, maybe those merchants will pay their bill.."
Rich from the East End June 16, 2013 at 08:02 am
Better yet, rather than pay mag's invoice. send $$$ to Artist.
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:41 pm
And he really still doesn't see that he's stealing from the artist to 'bring business to Greenport'?Read More The effrontery of his comment leaves me aghast. Of ALL people who should grasp the concept of plagiarism and copyright laws, it should be a newspaper editor/publisher! Cropping out her signature proves they knew full well that they were stealing her work. I'd suggest the artist contact a copyright attorney pronto. I'm always astonished when something like this occurs when a simple phone call to the artist might have been successful in allowing him to use her work WITH her signature intact instead of doing something so underhanded.
Pat Mundus June 14, 2013 at 08:51 am
I have a 16mm and great 1940s speakers for it. Hope your film holds up for viewing...thrilled to putRead More it to good use. Call my office 477-6993
Scotty June 16, 2013 at 08:31 pm
I've just tried to do a Google search for you and from what I've found you need to either check withRead More your local library to see if they have one they might lend you--OR--try Audio/Visual online companies. There are some which DO rent projectors for days or weekends. I have one but just checked with my husband and at the very least it needs a replacement bulb(which are fairly expensive)--hasn't been looked at in years so there's no way I could guarantee it would work. You've definitely given me an idea, though--I'll get mine in shape at some point and rent it to folks for a nominal sum. I'm sure there are many others who have old film they'd enjoy viewing for family reunions as would my own family. Good luck. If you don't succeed for next weekend, you have other options. At the very least you might be able to have the film transposed to a DVD and distributed to your family members although that's costly too, depending on how many copies you need. Just a thought, but you could add the old footage in with some taken AT the reunion as a nice follow-up gift for the attendees?