Southold Town Opposes East End Redistricting Proposal
Members of the Town Board speak out against a united East End First Assembly District recently proposed, saying the region should have two voices in Albany.
To Southold Town Supervisor Scott Russell, the North Fork faces issues that are much different than the South Fork — which is why he said at Tuesday's Town Board work session that he is vehemently against a redistricting proposal that would unite the Twin Forks and Shelter Island in between to form a new First Assembly District.
Last week, Assemblyman Fred Thiele, I-Sag Harbor, said in a statement that under a new plan proposed by the New York State Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment, his district would have new boundaries and become the new First Assembly District. He would continue to represent East Hampton and Southampton towns. But with the addition of Southold and Shelter Island towns, he would lose a portion of southeast Brookhaven Town. Assemblyman Daniel Losquadro, R-Shoreham, currently represents the First Assembly District, and Thiele represents the Second.
Though Russell said that he thinks Thiele, an East End separatist who would like to see the region split from Suffolk County and become a new entity — Peconic County, has been a good assemblyman for the South Fork, he didn't want to lose a separate voice representing the North Fork.
"The South Fork has always had a mightier voice than the North Fork in Albany," the supervisor said. "I'd rather the region continue to have two voices in the assembly. The East End has historically been represented by good people — why cut it down to one?"
Russell's board members agreed.
"I think it's a slap in the face to the people of the North Fork to say that you're going to cut representation," said Councilman William Ruland. "Albany tends to lose sight about what is best for all the people, not just certain people."
Russell said that ongoing issues such as railroad transportation and ferry service are unique to the North Fork and need focused and separate representation. Dan Losquadro told Patch last week that he thinks the North Fork is better served by being contiguous with the North Shore as far as representation goes.
"Shelter Island has its own unique set of issues and could be served by either the North or South Fork, but the issues are different between the two forks," he said. "For one, the North Fork has a much higher rate of primary homeownership than the South Fork. And the North Fork has a much larger agricultural sector than the South Fork."
Southold Town Councilman Chris Talbot said that the only benefit he could see under Thiele's proposal is that as the state moved forward with changing pensions plans, the town might save more money with Thiele in the assembly.
"It's a big fight," he said. "Thiele's been swerving down the middle now for some time and might have more pull there ... On the other hand, he's never had a private job — does he know what it's like out here in the private sector?"
In a poll posted on North Fork Patch last week, readers also expressed more disapproval than agreement about the redistricting proposal.
Erin Schultz
2:43 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
UPDATE: A public hearing has been scheduled on Feb. 9 at 11 a.m. to address this redistricting issue with Assemblyman Dan Losquadro and other North Fork elected officials at the W.H. Rogers Legislative Office Building in Hauppauge.
William Swiskey sr
9:34 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
A work day, Only 50 minutes drive, Why not Riverhead and Southold Town Halls in the evening on a friday. Fred to busy?
fred thiele
4:03 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
This story is rife with mistakes. First, of all, the re-districting proposal is not "Fred Thiele's". It is the proposal of the New York State Legislative Task Force on Demographic Research and Reapportionment. The public hearing referred to in the update is the Task Force's Long Island hearing, one of nine being held across the State to hear the public on the entire redistricting plan.....not just the 1st Assembly District.
The East End is too large for just one district and not large enough for two. The North Fork does not have sufficient population to have its own district. In redistricting, the issue was whether Southold and Shelter Island should be in an East End District or a Brookhaven District. Similarly, the issue is whether the Shirley, Mastic and Mastic Beach community (William Floyd School District) should be divided in half or kept whole in a Brookhaven district. The Task Force put Southold and Shelter Island in the East End and Mastic, Mastic Beach, and Shirley in Brookhaven. Does Southold really have more in common with Brookhaven than Shelter Island, Southampton, and East Hampton? BTW, Southold and Shelter Island were with the South Fork in the State Assembly for more than 200 years until it was divided in 1980 to create better districts for the west end.
William Swiskey sr
8:45 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Spoken like a true politican. How about we grab part of East hampton just enough people to meet the quota, you'll still have enough left to keep your seat. Promise
forward thinking
3:22 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
ACCURATE INFO BY YOU... WITH SOME THE EMOTIONAL BRAIN OVER POWERS OUR INTELLECT. I AGREEWE DO HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH S.I. AND SO. FORK THAN BROOKHAVEN.
Erin Schultz
4:19 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Fred -- I have clarified the origins of the proposal. Thanks for your comments.
Richard Blumenthal
4:55 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
I wonder how the North Fork would feel about their representative in Albany simultaneously representing the South Fork Village of Sag Harbor as Village Attorney?
Benja Schwartz
6:15 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
It is not about the men, the proposed change of law would strengthen the position of the East End, reconcile the differences and build on the common interests of the North anf South Forks. This is not about Peconic County it is about an improved Suffolk County.
forward thinking
6:37 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
bs- i agree i would rather be rep.'d by an east ender who is voted on by east enders that one who might be swayed by the bkhvn machine. i have worked with thiele and found him to be focused and not influenced by emotions of political adjendas. and to RB far better than a "up-islander" who rep.'s their interests.
Richard Blumenthal
7:28 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
ft, you consider Dan Losquadro an up islander?
Cyril K Lukeman Jr
8:00 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Assemblyman Thiele's spirited defense of the proposed redistricting of the 1st Assembly district which would separate Southold Town "again" from its historical ties with Riverhead Town. I use "again" as Riverhead was once Southold's western hamlets.
Theile asks does Southold have more in common with Brookhaven than the South side towns of Southampton and Easthampton? The answer, to many of us raised on the North Fork, is Yes. We are bound by our agricultural, maritime and blue collar ties which run along Suffolk's north shore. Assemblyman Thiele should also be cognizant that portions of the present 2nd Assembly District which would remain in the 2nd AD are part of The Suffolk County Legislature's 1st Legislative District which recognizes Southold's ties to Riverhead and the blue collar area of the 2nd AD note not its more affluent NYC influenced Southampton and Easthampton townships.
Assemblyman Theile should note he would be no longer representing the 2nd AD but possibly the 1st AD and we in the 1st AD have our own perspective of our shared history.
William Swiskey sr
8:41 pm on Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Southold Town doesn't need Fred Theile. Why are the public forums held up island and not locally in each North Fork Town and Village. Thiele only wants more power, The lines could be drawn differently, next step will be to redraw the county legislative district. Good Bye Edd Romaine, that really would be a loss. I think a flyer to each voter explaining what's happening should be sent out. What are we Texas?
Richard Blumenthal
8:24 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Mr. Thiele seems to be defending the proposal, but wants no responsibility for its creation, but doesn't state an alternative, but doesn't say he opposes it, but doesn't say it's a good idea...whew! Wait, let me guess. He's a career politician. That explains it.
forward thinking
8:33 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
he would rather have the "people" have a say and then choose i am for east end representation rather than 1/4 west and 3/4 east...
Richard Blumenthal
8:44 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
When they asked his opinion about his own District in the Democrat caucus he faithfully attends, he replied, let's leave it up to the people? Not likely.
William Swiskey sr
9:55 am on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Sorry Fred It won't work, find a real job.
forward thinking
1:52 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
ws - nihilism here we come
Tom
3:37 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
Well now that we know Mr. Thiele is here reading and responding, allow me to ask two simple questions.
1- In 2004, the East Hampton town board prohibited Cross Sound ferry from operating in their town. After the recent conclusion of seven years of taxpayer funded litigation, East Hampton won their case, no ferries. Southolders were in favor of an expansion of service onto the south fork, as it would relieve traffic here, as well as through Shelter Island, also soon to also be part of your district.
Mr. Thiele, what is your position on this matter? How will you work to address our concerns in Southold and Shelter Island on this issue? And will you speak out in favor of expansion of ferry service to the South Fork, if only for the purposes of mitigating traffic, pollution, and unnecessary vehicle miles, on the North Fork and Shelter Island. Many of us feel as though your highly funded connections in the South Fork used their influence to get what they want, at the direct expense of the North Fork.
2- One word: Helicopters.
They go to the South Fork, and overfly the North Fork at low altitudes, and high speeds. They service the South Fork, at the expense of the North Fork. Notwithstanding the recent FAA minimum altitudes, which will not matter, as they are ether in departure ascent or arrival descent as they transit the North Fork, what is your position on this issue? Will you work to mitigate the problem, and address our concerns?
We await your responses.
Tom
12:42 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Mr. Thiele, just in case you think we forgot, we didn't. Will you not do us the courtesy of providing a response to the items outlined above? It has been 6 days.
Or do we on the North Fork get the same response from you that we do from Mr. Bishop, which is, no response at all.
Once again, we await your responses.
BOB PALADIN
5:37 pm on Thursday, February 2, 2012
our pastor at sacred heart here says this issue best ' on the south shore small raw fish is called Sushi on the working north fork we call it BAIT'.. there is no way we have anything in common with the hamptons .. this is another consolidation of power by albany and its cronies....good luck stopping this from happening
forward thinking
12:20 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
and "up-west" chum and fert'lizer. better with so. fork than with bkhvn... but that said no. fo from orient to shoreham as one --- montauk to shirley as one and i dont like a rep who goes indep then runs dem .
BOB PALADIN
12:32 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
having had the distinct pleasure of living in crookhaven we will lose our identity to the crook crats that STILL RUN TOWN GOVT same place
just different names on the office doors
forward thinking
12:55 pm on Friday, February 3, 2012
exactly why - thiele is better tnan a westerner but best is no. fo sep and so. fo seperate -- are we will ing to pay for ir ????? ziedler, jay,powel,malk sleeping at board meetings it was fun to watch but you got a lot for your $$$
Ken Allan
11:00 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
As a full time resident of Southold, I am in total favor of the proposed revised district.
It makes total sense to have Southold and Shelter Island in the same assembly district as East Hampton and Southampton towns. The issues in these (4) towns ARE often the same, and the local residents of these (4) towns have more in common than some VERY narrow minded people think. Riverhead Town does have many issues that are different than the other (4) towns and it should be in a different district.
BOB PALADIN
11:09 am on Monday, February 13, 2012
ken when we all merge to one district its going to be the 'golden rule'[ he that has the gold makes the rules]... first thing you will hear is the sound of endless helicopters taking the rich to weekend, then you hear police sirens when all the homeless, shelterless people get gentrified and sent here and are taken in, the next sound you will here[groans] is the locals being 'squeezed' like oranges for every last of income they have due to increased taxe.s and cost of living.. please give me an example of 4 issues that are the same for ALL
Ken Allan
2:09 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
Very easy.
1. Beach access
2. Open space preservation
3. Public input on development
4. MTA payroll tax
and don't tell me that you don't realize the local south fork people are also impacted by chopter noise, they are !
I could keep going with the issues that are the same, but Ive proved my point.
Tom
12:08 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
I would just like to point out that although we know he reads and comments on this forum, Mr. Thiele has completely failed to address issues noted above. Interesting, because in effect, Mr. Thiele is being appointed as our new elected official, even though we have not elected him. Therefore, this time around he gets to dodge the issues we bring up, and not address any of our concerns. In effect, he is being deposited upon us, to rule, without any input from the citizenry. So this time, he has the luxury of not replying, not addressing, and, in effect, completely ignoring our concerns. Mr. Thiele is not even giving us the time of day here, he is just silently smiling, as his realm expands.
Fine, be that way. Just note that come the next election round, we are going to remind you of this very forum, and your behavior in not responding to our concerns.
forward thinking
3:34 pm on Monday, February 13, 2012
I Think We Should Wait For The Reality Rather Than Ponder Something That Has Not Happened. He In The Past Did His Due Diligence In Representing The So. Fork (His District). I Can’t Believe People Are Condemning Him For His Positions When Representing Interests Of The So. Fork. If He “Killed” The Ferry More Power To Him. That Is What He Is Elected For. Would He Work As Hard For Our (No. Fork) Interests I Think So. I Was Involved With Him When I Was In Brookhaven (Not His District) And Asked Him For Support For Ed Romaine – He Reviewed The Request – And Backed The (Then) Proposal. Let The Rhetoric Begin When It Is A Reality And Deal In Facts Not Hearsay. HE WILL WHEN IT COMES TIME INVESTIGATE / AND PRESENT HIS POSITION AND THEN WE CAN (VOTE) DESIDE.